Maybe the ā€œminimalismā€ in the protocol is a thing the devs can appreciate.

For me, as an user, I only can interact with the protocol through its clients.

Because from what I see, feature-wise, I think nostr is more complete than other social networks…

Zaps. Invoices. Self-verification. Relays management. Nests. Long-form. Etc.

Which leads to having options between ā€œminimalistsā€ and ā€œmaximalistsā€ clients, and that’s a good thing. 😁

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I agree with you. It’s impressive how much can be done with Nostr!