the narrative that seems to be unfolding around kirk’s alleged assassin is that he was radicalized on internet platforms
will probably be used to further restrict speech
Discussion
There is always a motive.
Soon you'll have to kyc for internet access. Aka to use your bitcoin.
Pam Bondi said they are going to arrest people for Hate Speech.
Would it be unreasonable to demand persons appointed to government positions swear to uphold and defend the constitution and bill of rights? Fuck you, Pam
100%
Have to assume this was the plan all along.
Earn up to 2,000 daily with robotic high signals through a license trader experience, Text on t.me/Involiosupportassist their verified telegram
Use fear to strip freedoms. They don’t care about safety, they care about control.
The Hegalian Dialect in action again...
Problem, reaction, solution.
Here we go again!
I'm getting radicalized right now on Nostr...
Digital IDs for everyone globally, any excuse that sticks will do
Of course odell and marty wont name Israel. I cant even stand listening to them anymore dance around the elephant in the room.
In his name, despite being against his own stated beliefs.
cui bono bitches
And moments later Pam Bondi says theres no place for hate speech.
When your a hammer, everything is a nail. When you’re a system of control, everything is an opportunity restrict.
This is why we nostr
The 1st amendment is a proclamation that you shall not be harmed for speaking.
In Charlie Kirk’s case, this was violently offended.
Only in super clown world could this act lead to “more” restrictions to freedom of speech.
🤡🌎
You are right and it’s happening. Our movement and speech will restrict .
The only tools that work to control population is by terror .
Kirk tragic assassination is a terror .
They will use that terror to slip in their control .
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=czVBmqZP6Ss
Was he the assasin though? Candace was a very close friend of Charlie and doesn't seem so sure about that..
If that is the only thing that happens then you got lucky.
This looks like a concentrated efford to manufacture consent in the public to go after the political opposition. They will brand all of them extremist no matter how "center" or liberal they claim to be.
Yes, exactly. They are already working on it. And if they have their way, it’s not going to end there. The “logic” is that Charlie Kirk would not have been assassinated, if:
a) the people in power were in total control of speech (no hate/dangerous speech)
b) the people in power knew everything about everyone’s personal life (no privacy)
c) the plebs would not have guns (goodbye to the 2nd amendment)
Thankfully we simply don’t let them have their way. People are waking up.
As opposed to what, reading books at the library? Getting mad at the TV? Meeting people in the park?
It's 2025. Most things that happen are Internet involved.
Even my rec league pickleball had online registration...
True but one of Charie Kirks main message was free speech so i think that might help…
He also seemed to have used money so let's restrict access to money. And he also breathed in air so we might have to control inhaling oxygen for everyone.
No way, not like they are now talking about hate speech… dang it!
