Hydroelectricity is arguably the most ecologically devastating form of energy production.

Why is it considered Green Energy?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think most people, including myself, aren’t as aware of its effects compared to things such as windmills and solar panels.

You’re saying hydro is worse than those?

It's hard to say which is worse.

Certainly large scale Hydro ruins ecosystems but windmills kill tons of birds.

Everything has a cost. Some people choose to ignore this or pick and choose. Willfully.

🤙

Don’t get me wrong, I’m against all of them and understand that hydrocarbon energy production is superior in all ways. Just didn’t know how detrimental hydro specifically was

yeah it destroys salmon runs, etc.

I didn't mean you at all if that's how it read. I'm pointing the finger at climate extremists.

🤙❤️

🫡🫡

The way it is currently implemented, yes. You can line river edges with funnel turbines that do not disturb fish. Creating a giant dam is bad for a number of reasons.

No. This is more of a gets ya thinking post.

The point is make is that no energy is green energy.

100%

The concept of ‘green energy’ itself is a fake fiat construct

Sustainability should be the discussion ?

Sustainability of what

The source of energy

Micro hydro is amazing.

because 'they' say so.

conveniently blind... some people are.

🤙

Any thoughts on the dam they built in CO that has uranium tainted rocks all up in it?

sounds horrifying.

which dam is it?

This is what I came across. Hopefully I'm just misunderstanding something but, shit..

https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/chimney-hollow-dam-tallest-twenty-years-colorado-uranium/

"... are hopeful that filling the reservoir with water will help dilute the levels of uranium detected in water currently..."

should read "... we're hopeful that everyone will forget about the uranium so we can do absolutely nothing about it..."

#realitybites

#sardonic

This is cool because now it’s both a hydro plant and a nuclear plant.

The rough part is the article is talking about drinking water!

Yeah POAST name

Well, I think the energy "market" is mostly two large gangs fighting for dominance so all the nitpicky terminology is nothing but marketing and therefore entirely meaningless. That's how come hydro is considered "green" (and therefore sacred or holy or whatever) while the most modern nuclear plant is considered to be on par with the dirtiest, unfiltered, late 19th century coal power plant.

🤝

Because it makes other people money

Because it doesn't produce plant food

The term itself is dumb… actually pissing me off the more I think about it 😂

NUCLEAR is the way

So much destruction