This is why the Constitution has the 2A … to protect private property (against tyranny).
Discussion
Constitution is useless peace of paper the moment a government decides to break the rules. I live in Argentina and I can tell with real life experiences that assuming constitution will protect you is wrong.
Based and true
I have been feeling a lot of love & compassion for the people of Argentina over the last few years...
you really got fucked hard over there so I totally believe you.
At lease Messi made it a bit sweeter with world cup.
Viva Argentina 🤙💖🫂
Unlike most (all?) other countries, there will be the risk of mortal cost to those enforcing any policy that goes against the Constitution in America.
It is part of the reason I am bullish on America long-term and excited to see sound money return to our foundational institutions outlined in the United States Constitution.
🇺🇸America as a nation-state will not only survive, it will thrive when we achieve hyperbitcoinization. It’ll look a lot different than it does today (sure!) but there will be government of the people, by the people, for the people once more.
That risk will be there until it’s broken. Believe me.. many many died here on both sides.. there was a risk of dying if you wanted to violate constitution and yet they did it
Government has a lot of power .. military service also.. it’s not easy but is still possible. They can go impose bans and rules on you using gray areas of the constitution first
But yes, of course United States is safer .. but don’t give it for granted
Adding to this.. even Japan, Germany and many other countries in Europe had their constitutions until someone else took over
There were countries during Nazi times that had all their records taken so Nazis would know who has the money, who is from what religion etc
So that is my message.. don’t give it for granted
Start at 7 minutes
Okay, an important disclaimer: a United States citizen has to be willing to USE the benefits afforded by the 2A when the time comes.
Otherwise it is an empty threat, I agree.
But Brock, again .. tyranny don’t care about what are your constitutional rights. Thinking of the 2A is only useful under democratic governments but NOT under tyranny .. or in the event a country is invaded by other