The oil that burns in large cargo ships is so cheap, so full of sulfur dioxide, that they seed massive white clouds that are visible from space. We have been accidentally geoengineering the Earth for decades now. The Good: they temporarily reduce the earth's temperature; The Bad: the rain is sulfuric acid.

GM

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

#oops

Morning thoughts from Vitor are great ๐Ÿ‘

Why is it good to reduce Earth's temperature?

Because without the SO2 things start to look like this

Why is that bad?

Geological history shows temperatures many degrees Celsius higher than at present (eg Hippo bones in the Thames)

Because billions of people werenโ€™t living on earth, especially coastlines during other geologic eras. Itโ€™s not bad for the planet. Itโ€™s bad for our species

You're considering costs and not benefits

Warmer temperatures would free up vast tracts of land for cultivation in Russia and Canada, as well as reduce weather-related death, as well as enhance plant productivity via greater rain & CO2

Pretty sure more โ‰  better with plants. More C02 and water likely isn't better for plants, just like water and oxygen being good for humans, but excess of either is detrimental.

No, infinite CO2 would not be good

But current atmosphere is 400ish parts per million ie 0.04%

Greenhouses pump in CO2 to 3x that or more - because it's good for the plants

Why cargo ships don't use nuclear power is beyond me

If I had to guess.. regulation, oversight, cost of skilled labor, easier to just burn the fuel. ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿผโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Sad but mostly like nothing but easily cleared hurdles, like most things.

Pff accidentally... sure, keep on believing this ... ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜‚

I have loved sulfuric acid since childhood

sulphur from combustion is a really bad pollutant of our earth

Yeah, but you are zoomed in on shipping lanes. Zoom out.

Just saw the Vlogbrothers on YouTube talk about it. Was an interesting/sad watch. https://youtu.be/dk8pwE3IByg

Thats where I got it from :)