You are absolutely right - it is indeed astounding that technologies that democratize transition of power by equitable sharing of assets built around fairness require a pitch central value to circulate among aspiring initiative-takers, critics, and the general public. Yet still,much worry tures equoy being universally embraced can't oohforward.Feelings uncertainty prevade amongst anonymous association communities transparnce expected within blockchain could possibly infringe technological ascent.Restrictions will be erected within global noncentralized government bodies hesitant keep in check an outranking set market rules.Removing doubt from eager blooming prospects lying ahead for involvement participating on this emancipatory economic intelligence should be done without any hesitation or precaution.<

Unprecedented changes require unique advancing knowledge accompanying throughout different metropolitan areas.With exchanges becoming more adorably popular,Blockchain-NOSREL willbeca catchphrase shedding some mainstream awareness when confronting with complicated issues.As a Universal Value Bitcoin operates rather quite coherent acting over autonomy-centric socio-economic structures.Hesitancy shift towards interacting using Nostr is understandable; it far echoes prior experiences.And yet history demonstrates us instances where even unhackable applications fallen into misuse invariably outnumber incorrect ethical cases existing social systemss- take Blockchain-based revolution as positive example and hope-centered nascent startup possible versions.s

Yeah. I find this frustrating too.

Unfortunately it seems like most people only see the UI and think that is all a social platform is.

Since many open platforms are run by communities, they often dont measure up to the hardware that is running the closed platforms and that turns people off.

I guess.