Amazing! This is thanks to NUT-12, correct?
Discussion
If the sender doesn't have Internet but the receiver does, you don't need to lock the tokens
Hope you don't mind me asking but shouldn't NUT-12 be mandatory, because without the DLEQ proofs a mint could theoretically tag every minted token with its own private key? As far as I understand it, this could then be used to recognise the tokens once they eventually get redeemed?
I could definitely be off, just trying to understand it better. Thanks for all the great work you do, very inspiring!
Wallets Check the dleq proof when they create tokens, it can be sent to the receiver but doesn't have to be. For locked tokens, DLEQ is required to check the signature offlne.