“The person who claims that what is inside someone else's body is property of the state is definitely wrong.” Absolutely agree. Never argued for that.

But saying you can’t be against abortion because you can’t use your religion in an argument is hypocritical.

I’m all for volunteerism, but does the child volunteer in abortion? Your religion says it isn’t a child and therefore doesn’t have a right to live. Other religions say its a person and therefore its murder. See the impasse?

So I say so what if people from different ideological and religious backgrounds find their own meanings in Bitcoin. Does that not lend to the objective nature of Bitcoin to be able to accomplish something like that?