This is the correct solution to the bits vs sats debate

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Strongly disagree. 599 sats. It's just redundant to split different fractions into separate denominations. If this is good, then why not have a different word for every single decimal back from a full Bitcoin.

Bits is stupid

nostr:nevent1qqsyetuuz8ye7ueuc4gsym5m0hvadfzy0qhmq0pfgqpkw7kl6t4667gpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7q3qjlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qxpqqqqqqzl3vmq4

I agree. I really like this and hope it catches on. But it won't.

Is this still a thing? Sats âš¡ is the practical standard