Strongly disagree. 599 sats. It's just redundant to split different fractions into separate denominations. If this is good, then why not have a different word for every single decimal back from a full Bitcoin.
Bits is stupid
Strongly disagree. 599 sats. It's just redundant to split different fractions into separate denominations. If this is good, then why not have a different word for every single decimal back from a full Bitcoin.
Bits is stupid
Have you heard of... the metric system?
Touché .
But when a measurement is expressed we choose just one word. We don't say, 5 centimeter and 1 millimeter. We say 5.1 centimeters or we say 51 millimeters. So your example still doesn't make sense.
ie. We aren't redundant with different words to express different fractions. We just use one word.
Let's hear your suggestions for each decimal point back from one full Bitcoin. It's supposed to be a fun silly argument anyways. I will agree to your system, but we need the words but I'm still going to use sats.