Theorized*
Discussion
Every time I jump I always land a few seconds later. Every time I throw a ball, it hits the earth a few seconds later. That's gravity. You can call it by any name you want, Shinzo, Pinzo, Quazzeemodo, anything. It's still real. We live with it our whole lives.
If, by chance, you don't believe in "gravity", how do you explain the fact that things fall down, and not up?
Gravity is a theory trying to explain *why* the natural phenomenon of denser things falling down through less denser medium is true.
It's irrelevant if I believe the natural phenomenon, as it's a fact of our world. I can, however chose not to believe in your attempt to explain why it happens.
I also don't have to offer you any counter-theory why it happens - falsifiability doesn't require a new theory.
Nope.
The Cavendish experiment disproves your density theory.
You don't even know that your own model has since Einstein entirely disregarde Newtonian gravity.
The same will happen in due time with the relativistic nonsense as it's more make-belief material, and not consistent with observations.
Nice claims, but you're not addressing the point here. You can see with your own eyes, in the Cavendish experiment, attraction between masses that has nothing to do with density.
Electrostatics is a real, verifiable thing. Get a vandergraaff and start making things "anti-gravity"!
Electrogravitics is very interesting and real, yes. But it proves nothing in relation to your "density" theory.
Gravity does not depend on density, and I proved it to you. Why do you keep ignoring evidence that contradicts your theories?
Electrostatics is a far more logical and experimentally demonstrable explanation.
You cannot define gravity, and you have clearly spent no time examining its explanations within your own paradigm. You just made up a definition. Is Newtonian, Einsteinian or quantum that you believe in? Can you explain the differences between these?
You claimed that she wouldn't be able to explain anything. She explained what she understands by "gravity", proving you wrong. Now you want an entire dissertation on general relativity? Stop with this nonsense, please.
Accept that questioning everything is good, but doing it for the sake of it is stupid.
And don't get me wrong, I like you, I really like you, but this fanaticism for flat earth theory is unhealthy.
Oh, “proving” me wrong by describing the supposed effects of gravity rather than defining what it is?
I asked about the different types of gravity which she blindly subscribes to, to demonstrate the fact that she wouldn’t even know. She effectively described mass attracting mass, which, within your own belief system hasn’t been valid for a century.
I have nothing against you homie. I was a hardcore space believer my whole life.