I'm not a fan of the government but I don't believe they are brewing up hurricanes and steering them into states. Get a grip

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Its getting harder and harder to get a grip anymore

when conspiracy theorists jump the shark lol

never go full retard.

How do you know what full retard is? They've said for years that you're retarded if you think fluoride is bad for you.

https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/assessments/noncancer/completed/fluoride

in terms of energy requirements,

a disinformation campaign about fluoride

!=

moving millions of tons of water with organized purpose over weeks

one of these is clearly possible,

the other isn't.

nostr:nevent1qqsfsqxlc39cszgu3hgvp9zxutcv3nk9g88hr97gf0xknd6n7c4kakgpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qgs0npwnpyvheqz7zuvuwvv9k460c0hyqlturds40hhfn34vufvehwcrqsqqqqqpr769xx

Flouride in the water wasn't a disinformation campaign. It was an evil effort to break the children. Know the difference.

Frequency amplitude is not visible, and there's more than enough energy in it. Seriously, go down this rabbit hole. Deal with what's down there.

Maybe I will at some point

but today we're talking about hurricanes.

At the moment, we're talking about defining terms. You say "don't go full retard," but you don't really know what you mean by that because you haven't considered the extent of what the largest, self-funded govt in human history can possibly do. Flouride was a simple, easy to understand example of it (a chemical inserted into a natural resource to harm us).

jfc dude

not everything is an opportunity to bring up your pet issue.

if you have some data that demonstrates its even REMOTELY PLAUSIBLE hurricanes can be human generated I'll look at it.

nobody is contesting they can put fluoride in the water and lie about it.

The weather patent info has already posted in this thread. Thing is, you're the one who decided to set the bar about what "too far" is, and yet at the end of the day, all you can say about it, is " evidence, pleeese." There are a hundred ways you can get more info on this topic, but you'd rather mock because it's easier than thinking.

"Somebody posted a jpg that agrees with my opinion"

super convincing bro

Trust away. That's certainly a choice. 🤪

dumb response.

believing with no evidence is called "trusting."

saying "I haven't seen evidence for that" is agnostic.

Sure thing boss. You do you. The evidence isn't hard to find.

Disconnect: people can’t affect the climate so climate change is fake. Next breath, gov’t creates hurricanes

This lacks nuance.

Why not?

Just adding more priors to the sniff test. Look any ecological or environmental data, it is wildly noisy. Scientists can find significant trends but explanatory power of the relationships they examine are usually very poor. In summary, nature is a wild beast that is hard to control, predict and also measure. As for the clouding of the skies via jets... If these are indeed aerosols of various chemicals, the sunsets and sunrises would be getting more brilliant due to scattering light effects. I don't see evidence of this and no one seems to talk about it...

You would be way less a fan of the government if you did more research concerning these things rather than dismissing them.