⚡️🍻 WATCH - Tucker Carlson just asked the question millions quietly wonder: “Is even 1-2 glasses of wine actually bad for your brain?”
Dr. Daniel Amen, America’s most famous brain-imaging psychiatrist, didn’t hesitate:
Four years ago the American Cancer Society officially recommended ZERO alcohol — because any amount is linked to higher risk of 8 different cancers.
He then went further: society has sold us the idea that alcohol is basically a “health food.”
His exact words: “It’s a lie.”
He also reflects on 43 years in medicine watching other big trends collapse — pain as the “fifth vital sign” (hello, opioid crisis) and benzos as “mommy’s little helper.”
Sometimes the things we’ve been told are “perfectly fine in moderation” turn out to be anything but.
What’s one health belief you used to accept… but now question?
https://blossom.primal.net/91dccea93e808ad8dea6d8c3cbdb2615b366255fcc0418b4d0e7d7a740cb982e.mp4
“vitamin” A is a vitamin
nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqfnwaehxw309ah8wcewwpexjmtpdshxuet59ashjan2d3jkjmrd0qcxzmphdge8qut5xg68zetyx9arwcfcwvmu86vm wen discount price option for paying in bitcoin on square?
Watch this before you decide
No hype, no FUD, it's a scam! 😉
https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2019/01/15/quantum-computing-as-a-field-is-obvious-bullshit/
Read some more on Locklin’s blog. In case you didn’t see, he linked to this paper a few weeks back:
https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1237.pdf.
Hilarious 😆
I remember going down the string theory garbage hole many years ago and got to the the Planck interval bit and thought why theorize about something that can’t even be measured? String theory seemed interesting at first but then it disintegrated into gobbledygook. Maybe try to measure the thing first and then observe it and then theorize about it later 🤷♂️
What’s cqc? Best I found was centre for quantum computation
No hype, no FUD, it's a scam! 😉
https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2019/01/15/quantum-computing-as-a-field-is-obvious-bullshit/
I do know of a special donkey that can read, so imma stay worried 🤪
So just to be sure this timeline is incorrect? 👇
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqs2jc86rjvclgg734j73u0kss5l8kt45jp22g80deaeh0nqm0arkcql6ql0e
Is quantum computing still just mostly hype/FUD or do we need to actually do something soon this time?
⚡️💬 NEW - Amazon CEO, Jeff Bezos: « Within 10-20 years, the giant, gigawatt-scale data centers for AI training clusters will be built in space
This would leverage 24/7 solar power and make space a key part of Earth's industrial and technological infrastructure »
https://blossom.primal.net/fb75da4af102993067e2b1af3a52d5662a64634775b043db349f41a54e0a902e.mov
Smells like 8th sphere
Ah. So “Respectfully” was a lie then 🖕
Yes bad experience with state legislators so far. The entire system top to bottom is broken. We all know this, which is why many of us are here in the first place. I hope your dude gets a wider audience and we can all get some practical solutions. Education and awareness are always the first step and then it’s a slow grind from there
Yes, meds are just poisons. Useful sometimes and they can save your life but poisons nonetheless. I think it’s important to keep them in the correct category. Most don’t have that awareness that you developed
Posting this thread from nostr:nprofile1qyw8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttjv4kxz7fwwak8vuewwdcxzcm9qythwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnxd46zuamf0ghxy6t6qqsqyredyxhqn0e4ln0mvh0v79rchpr0taeg4vcvt64te4kssx5pc0sk99k65 here on Nostr for everyone's reference and my analysis of it: https://x.com/adam3us/status/1963830548012372324
My take:
**ADAM BACK DID NOT MENTION KNOTS**
People who called Adam “pro spam” (and worse) for weeks are now celebrating that “Adam is back.”
NEWSFLASH: he never left.
Obviously Adam freaking Back is not “pro spam” and never was.
He simply did not agree with the efficacy of the proposed "solution" (Knots node implementation) from a technical perspective (and still does not agree that node filtering of spam is a viable solution, based on my reading of his thread).
Instead, Adam is trying to lay out the *economic* case for how to deal with incentives to filter spam at the *miner/pool* level, while clearly stating “bitcoin is about money, spam has no place in the timechain. what defaults the bitcoin core project puts in the reference client matter in this."
Again, clearly Adam is not "pro spam."
A key line that jumped out to me was “to prevail, we have to make economic sense (or we work against our own objectives)”.
Adam focuses on *miners/pools*—and their economic incentives, or lack thereof—not on node implementations.
If you’ve spent the past weeks bashing Adam because you think he is a “spam apologist,” now is a good time to check your assumptions and consider that Adam wants what is best for bitcoin... as do you... as do I.
We ALL want what’s best for Bitcoin to make sure it succeeds as unfuckable sound money and a censorship-resistant medium of exchange.
No serious person is like "OOOH YEAH I LOVE SPAM! MORE JPEGS ON THE TIMECHAIN, PLEASE!"
It is possible to disagree with the efficacy of a proposed solution *without* being a "spam apologist."
Just because someone has a different opinion than you do about a solution does not mean that person is your enemy or has been "compromised."
This should be obvious but apparently it needs to be said...
nostr:nprofile1qyw8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttjv4kxz7fwwak8vuewwdcxzcm9qythwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnxd46zuamf0ghxy6t6qqsqyredyxhqn0e4ln0mvh0v79rchpr0taeg4vcvt64te4kssx5pc0sk99k65 -- I hope I have not misrepresented anything you said -- just trying to help parse your thread for my fellow plebs. Thanks for all you do.
Sounds good. Do you have a practical guide on how to do this yet? Anyone? nostr:nprofile1qqspnzgrfett3asxcuj0gksje6z2zxzpvgd27uvz58m9vsuqh8zzw6cpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3jamnwvaz7tmswfjk66t4d5h8qunfd4skctnwv46z7keqank nostr:nprofile1qqsggcc8dz9qnmq399n7kp2yu79fazxy3ag8ztpea4y3lu4klgqe46qpzamhxue69uhkummnw3ezuat5dpshy6ewvdhk6tcpz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezum3dw35jumt99unyqedn How do I send my transactions to NOT MARA/spammers? Can you break it down further?
IVERMECTIN
This drug won a Nobel Prize...
But now they're trying to hide it.
Ivermectin.
Here's what it is, what it does, and why they don't want you to know the truth:
1. What is Ivermectin?
Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug originally developed to treat river blindness and other parasitic infections.
It won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015 for its lifesaving impact.
So why is it controversial now?
https://video.nostr.build/07a100e6cc56ab118ee23a6fe6da9b737935ae3876a4455ba24592858cdb5bde.mp4
2. Antiviral Properties of Ivermectin
Research has shown that ivermectin has antiviral properties beyond its use against parasites.
It has been studied to treat:
• Dengue fever
• COVID-19
• Zika virus
• HIV
But every time it shows potential, the dominant narrative tries to discredit it.
https://video.nostr.build/5af232b967923527af152c2890f25901011912be59739c65b7d07f947912ab56.mp4
3. How does Ivermectin work?
Ivermectin works by inhibiting viral replication and reducing inflammation.
It has been shown to:
• Block viral entry into cells
• Modulate the immune response
• Disrupt viral RNA replication
Despite promising data, it was severely suppressed.
https://video.nostr.build/bf91ad38efa3ecec43e90481a087f816a72631b0c1b0b9e00cad5da1dfd09643.mp4
4. The Controversy Surrounding Ivermectin
During the COVID-19 pandemic, ivermectin became a highly controversial topic.
Doctors using it faced:
• Censorship
• Media smear campaigns
• Threats to their medical licenses
Why so much resistance to a cheap and safe drug?
5. The Real Reason They Don't Want You to Use It
Follow the Money.
Ivermectin is off-patent and cheap.
If it worked for major diseases, it would threaten:
• The need for expensive new drugs
• Control over medical narratives
• The pharmaceutical industry's multi-billion-dollar treatments
6. What Science Really Says
Despite censorship, studies have shown:
• Positive results in certain clinical trials
• Antiviral effects in laboratory settings
• Benefits in modulating the immune system
However, many trials were rushed, flawed, or designed to fail.
7. Safety and History of Ivermectin
Ivermectin has been used for decades with an excellent safety record.
More than 4 billion doses have been administered worldwide.
However, it suddenly became "dangerous" when people began to explore its broader benefits.
8. Who benefits from censorship?
The same people who:
• Profit from expensive new drugs
• Control medical guidelines
• Own the major media outlets
If there's a cheap solution, they have no incentive to tell you about it.
REMEMBER WHEN the media laughed and said ivermectin was ONLY for horses and cows?
THEY KNEW it was created for humans back in 1987.
Here's what they didn't tell you 👇
1) It prevents damage caused by mRNA-based drugs, blocks the Spike protein from entering cells, and, if the person was vaccinated, they can be treated to reduce the damage already caused by ivermectin.
2) It only has beneficial effects and no harmful effects in treating the C virus. In fact, before entering the cell, it has already destroyed the virus in the blood.
3) It has powerful anti-inflammatory properties, impacts traumatic and orthopedic injuries, strengthens muscles, and lacks the side effects of corticosteroids.
4) It treats autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, fibromyalgia, psoriasis, Crohn's disease, and allergic rhinitis.
5) It improves immunity in cancer patients, treats herpes simplex and shingles, and reduces the frequency of sinusitis and diverticulitis.
6) It protects the heart in situations of cardiac overload. In a stroke, for example, it prevents cardiac hypoxia by stimulating basic energy production, preventing tissue destruction, and improving heart function.
7) It is antiparasitic and antineoplastic (anticancer). It is said to suppress the proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells, preserving healthy cells and improving the effectiveness of chemotherapy.
8) It can eliminate chemotherapy-resistant cancer cells, defeating resistance to multiple cancer treatments. Combined with chemotherapy or anticancer agents, it increases the effectiveness of these treatments.
9) It is antimicrobial (against bacteria and viruses) and strengthens the immune system.
10) It reaches the central nervous system and regenerates nerves.
11) It regulates glucose, insulin metabolism, cholesterol levels, and reduces liver fat in steatosis.
12) It can be used as a prophylactic agent and has been associated with a significant reduction in C-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality.
Conclusion
This goes beyond a single drug.
It's about how medicine is:
• Censored
• Politicized
• Controlled
Always question the narrative.
Always follow the money.
Please be careful with Ivermectin. It’s NOT safe. It’s a controlled opposition psyop:
nevent1qqst2drehv7sy9x3ts5gel7734jx7neqk2hl7pggkzzqs4f9v0tq8uqpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqawz8sv