“Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?- in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislation? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterwardl”

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Thanks! Very interesting quote

Wonder what he would make of Satoshi and the cypherpunks and their very expedient rule

Even echoes all the wrangling over bitcoin consensus presently--and hyperbitcoinization hasn't even set in yet!