Subnostr

Bitcoin clearly supports a lot of what Austrians have been saying for a long time. I'm not interested in dogma, I'm interested in understanding the world around me.

People who are caught up in Keynesian beliefs can benefit from understanding that govt spending & easy credit caused the depression, while cutting the budget & raising interest rates prevented a depression just a decade earlier.

If you weren't so caught up in your own stupid dogma & apparently blinded by some idiotic hatred you might have listened to the episode & learned something that makes understanding the benefits of bitcoin a bit easier.

Death to all Ancaps 2y ago

In his entire life, Von Mises wrote only 57 words about zero entropy value and storage systems which he didn't believe to be even possible. He (and Keynes are equally clueless about the ramifications of infinite stock to flow)

To say the Austrians (and all other heterodox economics) is relevant to bitcoin has nothing to do with dogma. It is the recognition that 60 does not and will never equal infinity.

Do get upset. Bitcoin has also destroyed leftist economics and Marx and Keynes as well

I don't need to listen to any episode of a thought system invalidated by mathematics. I used to be an Austrian up until the day I read the Bitcoin White Paper and understood the math of fixed denominator currency systems was the end of left/right bifurcation

One would hope a monetized decentralized social network would improve the courage of humans to face new ideas. But it appears a circular economy is destined to create circular thinking and nostr may well wind up a haven for cults that go no where

Focus on the math. It'll do you good

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Jeff Swann 2y ago

Go annoy someone else with your insane autistic ramblings & projections

Death to all Ancaps 2y ago

There's nothing insane nor autistic about knowing 60 does not equal infinity.

And just a reality check for you now.

1) Will Bitcoin Audible narrate opposing stances in Bitcoin especially backed with mathematical proof? Or is it just a propaganda channel?

2) You can't eliminate people from a censorship free open network - meaning actual debate might be your only way to build your safe zone

3) Now do you understand why Knut Svanholm is too chicken to come to nostr? There's real mathematicians here ready to destroy his comical numerology.

Jeff Swann 2y ago

What difference does it make, you're not going to listen either way, right?

You say others don't want to learn anything while making it clear you believe you have nothing to learn. That's a special sort of entertainment 😂👍

Death to all Ancaps 2y ago

I read Von Mises, Hoppe, Rothbard, Gramsci, Hayek etc etc

Now that the math of bitcoin has destroyed the math of the Austrians - why should I waste time with dead economists when the math of bitcoin is a thousand times more interesting?

When a token scammers tells me to be "open minded" to their con, I tell them to fuck off

You and your fellow cultists are no different to the token scammers.

Bitcoin is 21st century

You and your brother are chaining people to the 20th century and it's violent fake bifurcations

So. I'll use the elevator made of steel.

You can be "open minded" and use the one made of clay

Have a nice day (I'll be back another day to pester you and your ancap cult forever)

Death to all Ancaps 2y ago

Hang on I'll make you a deal.

Get that fucking ancap cult numerologist, Knut Svanholm over to nostr and I'll tear him to shreds (intellectually) instead.

He's too gutless to debate a real mathematician but lets see if he grows a spine and take on the adults in the room