Subnostr

this is only an issue because most clients don’t have a way to customize “replying to” although many have been motivated to implement this feature due to this recent mega list (sans a disclaimer to respect the mentions of the devs and not reply to the list). Disclaimer won’t be necessary when I can uncheck the people I don’t want to tag. This works two ways… so if you were replying to 5 people including me and I felt like the conversation had drifted away from the need to tag the 4 other people, I would respond only to you, and your only choose is to start a new thread manually tagging these people or to only reply to me.

You shouldn’t be receiving reactions to posts that you are simply tagged in.

daniele 3y ago

> You shouldn’t be receiving reactions to posts that you are simply tagged in.

Agree.

But depends on what you mean with "tagged". Explicit tag with @ should always be honoured, with the exception of blocked users.

If you refer to the "p" tag of the specs I double agree, I suspect clients use this to fire the notifications, while I suggest to focus the events and get the relations with the authors.

This fixes the "bad behaviour" of stuffing pub keys of every post in a thread.

NIP-10 doesn't seem to address the reply of reply case: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/10.md#the-p-tag

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

yunginter.net 3y ago

relax a bit, let the clients get out of beta.

Technically, clients only need to follow nip 01.

by tagged I mean mentioned in by a user putting your pubkey… of course the original author a1 should receive the reactions to their note.

If a client is sending me notifications that your reply to me was liked, I won’t use that client.

that’s the beauty of that technicality, and what makes nostr so great.