Better than a count of likes or a total sum of zaps would be a count of people who zapped, or something like that.
Discussion
Yeah.. I see the same problem in #Amethyst pools.
they're still under development, don't discard their usefullness
For me they are great. Probably a solution could be to be able to set a max amount of sats zappable for the answers. So one with no problems of zapping big could not move too much the pool. Like #zap per answer between 1/10 or 10/100.
1 sat per vote and 1 vote per pubkey seems the best
Yeah, again who creates the pool should have the possibility to set it, best option is more option 😁
nostr:npub1nxa4tywfz9nqp7z9zp7nr7d4nchhclsf58lcqt5y782rmf2hefjquaa6q8 what you think about it?
This is a tricky one for sure. Can see both sides of the argument.
For polls, if I'm the pollster, I'd much prefer being able to set a "vote minimum" and "vote maximum" where any vote less doesn't count, and voting over the max still results in 1 vote. The range could be chosen by the pollster allowing it to be tailored to the situation (seriousness, likelyhood of being brigaded, topic, etc)
But for a typical post, I think it really depends on how we want to view that stat. Is it an improved "like" showing you got my attention, or is it a tip jar showing how much I valued the content? I kinda feel like it should be seen as a tip jar. Healthier incentives
Or maybe
❤️/🤙 = A person that zapped
⚡= Total received through zaps
Both could be shown. Maybe both are valuable impression stats
Interesting idea
Sum of the logs of each zap
Would help balance number of people and monetary appreciation
Ugh, scoring mechanisms, here we go. Ok take the amount of time since the note was posted. (Time) and divide by the number of zappers (distance) which gives you the velocity score of a note. Then somehow mathematically sprinkle in total reach and total amount of Sats to get a truly horrendous number that nobody can understand.