Replying to ₿itcoin

Economy is a social instrument to see how much potential at progression is visible for you in many social aspects of civilizations, it indicates for example the willingness that someone else has given it to you in return for certain work, this indication gets measured with valuta, which gives those indications a number, but troughout history, this measurement is being manipulated to give extra tools for wars and power gaining strategies utilized by the central issuers in collaboration with those managing the economy and wars, for many many years to this day too, like how the fed is creating new money and invests in pro government corporations while also critisizing the first in thousends of years decentralized alternative called bitcoin which prevents governments from creating more money or taking it away from you, functioning as your optimal savings vehicle, secured by encryption and economic incentives, like blockrewards, mining fees, hashing, signatures, blockchain, proof of work, decentralized validation, broadcasting, difficulty adjustement, halvenings, unspend transaction outputs, elleptic curve encryption, asic mining, heat repurposing and much more that is all invented by an anonymous entity called Satoshi nakamoto, a real world legend, dissapeared but letting his legacy live on like noone has ever done before since the greeks, who were smart and had publicly controlled council who managed the money supply, altough Bitcoin works way better because everyone has to verify the validity of the transaction, and making sure it doesnt happen twice, as the economy would immeadiatly know thats cheating and reject it because it doesnt make sense, like crypto doesnt make sense because it is little and doesnt care about the freedoms that bitcoin had to battle and also does not have network effects to care about as much as Bitcoin does because it is so small, realize that if crypto became as big as Bitcoin, it would crash because network effects are too strong for them, unlike Bitcoin which was designed with this purpose in mind, making sure everyone has the same blockchain by making it difficult to create multiple valid versions of the blockchain by forcing anyone who wants to create a new block to add to the chain to find a value that starts with a given amount of zeroes trough a completely random process, which makes it difficult to find a long number with that amount of zeroes, which is called the difficulty (adjustment), together with signing and validating any transaction and including a reward for the computational power required in bitcoin in the block itself asswell as transaction fees, to keep the incentives high enough to secure the blockchain, altough there are many other attack vendors, that a healthy economy must defend against, like centralization of the healthy economy and manipulation tactics of the prices and keeping people dumb, altough that is combatted by meetups and power of the users, who are called bitcoinplebs or maxis and who also created their own communication protocol called nostr, to be independent from twitter and more, which can be used in entirely different configurations, and focuses around making your identity portable and integrating an economical savings vehicle to store your achievements, which is not possible via twitter or any other social media platform and helps plebs greatly when discussing bitcoin, making the signal better then when shadowbanning is applied, like in many corrupt systems troughout history, which Bitcoin defies in a milestone in civilization because it embodies what an economy truly is: signal and verifyable economic events, which spread information about the market to many participants and helping innovation and others, because as the saying goes: fix the money, fix the world.

My hand really hurts from writing one single sentence.

nostr:nevent1qqsr8ygah6zc44teehkmdd33ux2cn5me9yg399rgrwaq3nljcl6kpkcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvupzq0r3jarmy778rlvlg00cugwpm0fn9ucle2g3q2va0l5flr2ucql9qvzqqqqqqy98ck4v

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I am interested in this #orangepill subject but still learning the language. Can you help me with questions about this subject?

Is there a standard definition ‘to orangepill’? I get the gist that it is some sort of transfer of understanding in or believing in #Bitcoin performed by another. When someone has been orangepilled, does that means they share the proper consensus on Bitcoin? I am partial to the description of a free market economy supported by a sound exchange and store of value, but don’t believe Bitcoin is the only path. Am I not orangepilled?

Economy, as an instrument, suggests there is an intelligence and intend behind the proper use of that tool. I try no to understand the economy as an instrument to be wielded or manipulated by intelligence, but as a consensus world within which all our individual social interactions occur. The interactions (actions, connections, edges, forces, etc) are pronounced successful or unsuccessful only by those within the consensus. I can’t get to a sharing of eternal truth from here, but I am coming to understand that sharing may be enough, if the sharing provides success. Is it necessary to assign intelligence to ‘what’ wields the instrument called the economy?

My thinking is individuals moving in our economy makes the world (similar to quanta in motion). We don’t have to assign intelligence to it, or somethings else that is keeping people dumb. The best we can do is share what we are thinking and if that sharing creates a path to new consensus, the world will change.

Thank you

#asknostr

Orangepilling in my eyes is making people understand that sound money paves way for sound economy, and sound economy boosts everyone by providing an accurate signal.

People who are not aware of this are easier to manipulate. You do not have to assign intelligence to those people, or saying it is absent. But intelligence, or rather knowledge focused on this particular matter can help understand why the system is not fair.

And people who benefit tremendously from this unfair situation, do not want people to gather knowledge about how this works, therefore keeping them uninformed about this subject.