I am interested in this #orangepill subject but still learning the language. Can you help me with questions about this subject?

Is there a standard definition ‘to orangepill’? I get the gist that it is some sort of transfer of understanding in or believing in #Bitcoin performed by another. When someone has been orangepilled, does that means they share the proper consensus on Bitcoin? I am partial to the description of a free market economy supported by a sound exchange and store of value, but don’t believe Bitcoin is the only path. Am I not orangepilled?

Economy, as an instrument, suggests there is an intelligence and intend behind the proper use of that tool. I try no to understand the economy as an instrument to be wielded or manipulated by intelligence, but as a consensus world within which all our individual social interactions occur. The interactions (actions, connections, edges, forces, etc) are pronounced successful or unsuccessful only by those within the consensus. I can’t get to a sharing of eternal truth from here, but I am coming to understand that sharing may be enough, if the sharing provides success. Is it necessary to assign intelligence to ‘what’ wields the instrument called the economy?

My thinking is individuals moving in our economy makes the world (similar to quanta in motion). We don’t have to assign intelligence to it, or somethings else that is keeping people dumb. The best we can do is share what we are thinking and if that sharing creates a path to new consensus, the world will change.

Thank you

#asknostr