If you don't believe in either mathematical geometric proofs or real-world experimental evidence then you don't believe in anything, I'm sorry. Bitcoin might as well be powered by Thor's hammer for you.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What does this even mean? You can’t mathematically prove superposition unless you are measuring at Planck Time.

Show me a device that can measure Planck time and process the information between ticks in a logical sequence.

How does one converse with someone for whom nothing is real there's no such thing as proof?

Shrug. Whatever you want to be true, you do you.

You are the one defending a model of physics that claims temporal simultaneity and I’m asking you to prove it at the smallest unit of time, Planck Time.

Where is your proof that the modern definition of superposition exists at the smallest unit of possible time.

You can’t as it has not been measured. Therefore you are operating a model of physics on a convenient assumption and trust.

You're just one of those people that always goes one level down says "prove this exists", and then if someone can you just go one more level down, on to infinity. Gotta stop somewhere or no conversation has meaning.

You used the name Jack but prove the letter J exists. Prove this computer exists. Prove bitcoin exists. Prove the Dodgers are in the world series... Can you prove any of that? I'll wait.

I admire your patience. Some people can not be taken seriously.