the 🚩 of all the core policy removal defendoors don't have a legitimate argument is that they are resorting to ad hominems, criticising knots users for being christian and hostile to family destroying media and propaganda, and anyone who has looked closely would know that knots name relates to a quote from the bible where Jesus is flailing the banksters with a whip with knots at the end of it.

if there was any legitimacy in the idea of turning bitcoin into a CP jpeg database they would have actual arguments that relate to practical things like maintaining decentralization, not painting a bullseye on bitcoin for politicians, especially in the current climate with Chat Control attempting to legitimize KYCing social media users because of spammers who post adult content and worse on the social media.

they are instruments of evil, that's why they don't have arguments. they are consciously or unconsciously engaging in cultural marxist subversion tactics and are assuming that the highly technical cohort of bitcoin users don't have any grounding in philosophy or ethics. let alone network security and game theory.

thanks to all these jerks for making it clear to the rest of us that you are not interested in ending the perverted, corrupted tyrranny of banksters and who we should be interested in seeing say anything at all because yeah. i had muted will, but his rabid defense of core policy has made me realise that i was right to mute him. hipster jackoff, tim apple fanboi.

you can be wrong about one thing, but when you are wrong about 3 things and participating in a psychological warfare attack on bitcoin, you are three strikes.