This is really weird line of argument you're going down. I don't think anyone ever talks in pure facts. Ever. I think literally everything we say is an opinion.

So what you're really trying to do here is argue with me on the basis of some incredulity, which is really just as hominem.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

*an ad hominem.

Nope, just semantically sensitive sometimes. Don't you ever have discussions about semantics? I do all the time.

You may have noticed I responded to the content of the note as well.

I did not notice, unfortunately. The general increase in toxicity from a bunch of people, became pretty distracting.

Well what do you expect if you write a note like that? I don't mind to be able to read emotions or crude language in notes on here. Some things are just so important to people. Stating what you wrote and how you wrote it it's going to evoke response of a certain amplitude, that wasn't hard to foresee was it?