Seeing a lot of this attitude on Blue Sky unfortunately 
Discussion
His bio tells it all. No one will cry over his decision.
On the other hand muting is a good and fair tool - if one doesnât find value in certain topics, they should be free to opt out.
The true value of #Bitcoin is often hard to be grasped by people with financial privileges. If they donât want to learn about it now thatâs fine. Theyâll one day use it without necessarily realizing their financial transactions are built on top of Bitcoin.
One could say they need to âCheck Their Financial Privilegeâ?
He has job in game marketing. So I think there is higher probability of him to be shitcoiner purging âtoxic maximalistsâ.
But what is positive: he is on Blue Sky. So he generate network efect for Blue Sky.
It doesn't matter. No value has been lost with them blocking us.
This sucks because Iâm a Seattle Sounders fan too!! :( Oh well, tick tock next block :)
Do bitcoiners have some moral responsibility to save people like this or is NGMI sufficient
Not only do we have no responsibility to save him, but he's part of the enemy cabal. As bitcoiners we are actively trying to destroy him.
Fair. But let me give a contrarian utilitarian take: because every bit of energy that goes into Bitcoin strengthens itâs network effects, even these people should be encouraged to put in their energy to Bitcoin. Personally I want them to come last but still
I get the principle but I disagree.
I still have fears for Bitcoin once eternal September sets in. I fear that once too many enter, the attacks will be irresistible and that the 21 M damn will irreversibly break.
How would the attacks break the 21m cap? Do you mean like paper Bitcoin?
no, socialism. Bitcoin would lose its name to a fork that the overwhelming majority would use to transact.
They would say : look we need more subsidy to "grease" the economy. And the retards would believe them. And then all that economic power would shift to a fork where that's the case. We would be stuck with "bitcoin classic" or something.
So youre worried that the world can agree to a new fork of Bitcoin without any nations or other actors cheating?
Yeah, if there is one rising hegemon in the world, the incentives align to use his rules to get ahead. Cheating only pays when the hegemon is in decline.
A rising hegemon would get ahead himslef by dictating the use of a fork in which subsidy is increased. One excuse for such a thing would be "it's unfair that the maxis got so much of the network without contributing much". Doing so would end up setting back the true chains for decades.
For now we are in a declining hegemonic system and the hegemon is trying to keep control. Smaller parties are incentivized to cheat. Won't be the case for long.
Scammers đŤ¤
"He/Him. Vaccinated."
That side of politics has hated us for a long time. Deep down they're fascists trying to impose their world views on others. Bitcoin is inherently opposed to that.
Itâs funny because these people are opening calling bitcoiners fascists, if not even Nazis. Everyone thinks they know what that word means.
Pronoun declaration continues to be a valid heuristic by which I can safely assume a person's attitudes and beliefs on various issues with surprising accuracy
It correlates surprisingly well with controlling fascist beliefs. Probably because it has turned into a campaign to force everyone to state pronouns and behave in artificial ways.
We lost another pronoun guy. Rats.
Anyone who regards their medical status of ANYTHING in public is probably questionable at best
Last 2 points of his bio tell you everything you need to know.
"He/him"
"Vaccinated"
"Blockes anyone who sees things differently"
Bluesky doesn't start on the best path if these are its users.
Nostr >>>
nostr:note1f78pj92aan77sp2gtqkw5767kalj7fr2gz2ks9ynud4ptj7cyv4saxaega