Not being a whore is hell for feminists.

nostr:nevent1qqsy2dc4m2kkwtvykmh5mazqjmr8ns32qr00a283rceccuee2pfztmsppemhxue69uh5qmn0wvhxcmmvqgsx6lxv208g7s84duyue5mssa9xln4ammaxmqnktrmrf2a8kdknjcgrqsqqqqqp4ezmtf

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

We can tell you've never been with a woman... lol

The thing is though...

It's possible for a woman to avoid the drudgery of marriage and children without embracing whoredom. It's a great life strategy, isn't sinful, and is actually quite common.

I don't think they'd go for it.

"Great life strategy" is subjective.

"Isn't sinful" is between one and their Maker.

"Actually quite common" is a bandwagon fallacy.

" 'Great life strategy' is subjective. "

That's exactly my point. Some people are cut out for the marriage and family lifestyle and some aren't. It's subjective.

" 'Isn't sinful' is between one and their Maker. "

Nope. The sinfulness of a thing isn't decided as part of some negotiation between a creature and his creator. The creator tells us what's sinful and what's not. It's not up for negotiation. Staying single is explicitly categorized as non-sinful.

" 'Actually quite common' is a bandwagon fallacy. "

Bandwagon fallacy? What is this, eight grade debate class? LOL.

Yes, believe it or not, it really is *common* for a woman to opt out of the marriage and family lifestyle without being a whore. I'm referring to OP's post which stated that the only two viable options for a woman are to (1) marry young and start breeding or (2) become a whore.

See:

https://tinyurl.com/ynchdtah