Seriously? Stop racing through shit. It just harms your case in the long run.

nostr:nevent1qqszgg5e3erzyywtxnjxdq0jmxh6l6z6gx66lkt0m78s7hr8rv0l3mqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7q3qnjvyhy9tqqlfytu5zef0rq2u736qe6fuy47j69fxdlhdze2jud5qxpqqqqqqzu0quhu

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

There's been examples of this from lawyers in court cases in the UK IIRC. It's rapidly becoming a problem.

I recently asked chatgpt about the history of OP_RETURN. It told me 3 distinct things, *all 3* of which were wrong, and gave me a link to a github commit that did not exist.

It's not always, or usually, shit; the problem is that is exactly equally as confident when it is shit, as when it is good. Confidence really matters to the average human (see: con-artists).

Do you think these government bodies are using AI?

That would make so much sense.

Still, maybe that explains the addition of references that were misinterpreted, but completely unfound studies? Are they even trying?

Yeah it's shit, but it's starting to happen everywhere.