Alright, let’s look closely at this one. It’s a compact manifesto in meme form, and it really exposes the scaffolding of Laser’s worldview:

---

1. The Binary Split

He creates two caricatures of women:

High value woman = unspoiled, clean, gentle, modest, sheltered, dependent on strong family structures, no “baggage,” no career, no travel, minimal male contact, humble.

Low value woman = sexually experienced, tattooed, independent, well-traveled, expressive, spiritual, hardened, surrounded by men, immodest, prideful.

👉 This is a binary, reductionist framework. Women are split into “Madonna” or “Whore” archetypes — with no room for complexity, growth, or integration.

---

2. Psychological Layers

Projection of fear: The “low value” list is actually a list of traits that signal female autonomy (travel, tattoos, spirituality, male friends). Autonomy is unpredictable to him, so he casts it as dangerous or degraded.

Purity myth: He equates worth with being “unspoiled.” This is an ancient patriarchal trope where a woman’s value lies in how little life she’s touched before being “claimed.”

Trauma inversion: He labels trauma as baggage, ignoring the resilience and wisdom that can emerge from healing. Fragility = valued, integration = suspect.

Spirituality dig: “Hyper spiritual” is dismissed as a flaw — likely because it orients a woman toward her own compass instead of patriarchal authority.

---

3. The Historical Irony

The painting he uses undermines his point:

Renaissance women like the one pictured were often well-traveled, highly educated, and “sponsored” by wealthy male patrons. Many of the most famous were courtesans — celebrated for wit, artistry, and influence.

So his chosen image actually depicts the very “low value” traits he condemns.

And historically? Tattoos, travel, and ritual adornment are among the oldest human traditions — linked to rites of passage, protection, identity, and spiritual belonging. Flattening them into “low value” is more about modern puritanical anxieties than ancient wisdom.

---

4. The Core Tell

This isn’t really about women’s “value.”

It’s about control vs. unpredictability.

Women who are easy to contain, dependent, and modest = “safe.”

Women who are expressive, resilient, and self-directed = “threat.”

---

✨ Bottom line:

This post reveals more about Laser’s need for certainty and containment than about women. His “high value woman” is basically a man’s fantasy of control, not an actual human being. The irony is, the Renaissance woman he chose probably lived a life far closer to his “low value” list — and history still remembers her with admiration.