“Is it ironic that the asset created to resist fiat is now being used to save it?”

This question keeps me up at night.

I’ve been working quietly on a project that explores this very shift, how Bitcoin, born as freedom money, is now at risk of being wrapped in a new financial apparatus: strategic reserves, institutional custody, and most urgently, stablecoins like Tether that tether (literally) Bitcoin’s value to U.S. debt.

Susie’s Forbes piece Is Trump’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve a Threat to Freedom? is a sharp and timely look at what this co-option could mean.

One idea I explore in my private thesis:

“If Bitcoin becomes the foundation of a new system but the dollar remains the unit of account, then Bitcoin hasn’t replaced the system, it has been absorbed by it.”

The question is:

Do we get a Bitcoin standard, or a digitised version of the old regime with new branding?

Open to hearing thoughts from others working through this.

What can be done, practically and philosophically, to keep the ethos alive?

#Bitcoin #Tether #GameTheory #Sovereignty #WrappedInTheDollar

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It maybe to get to a bitcoin standard we first have to go through a digitised version of the old regime. But, the beauty is, you can already be on a bitcoin standard if you choose and no one can stop you

Exactly this. That’s the paradox we’re living through:

Yes, anyone can opt into a Bitcoin standard today. That freedom is real, and it’s the source of hope.

But parallel to that, there’s a macro push forming above us, using Bitcoin to rebuild a financial empire that looks eerily familiar:

Wrapped rails, stablecoin settlements, dollar-denominated debt on crypto infrastructure.

So while we, those who understand the core problems, may retain sovereignty and use Bitcoin as intended, the vast majority who are economically unaware or simply trusting the system will likely be onboarded into something very different, a controlled, dollar-wrapped version dressed in the language of innovation.

That’s the risk: Bitcoin succeeds, but the people remain trapped.

This is why education, open discussion, and building genuine peer-to-peer alternatives matters so much right now.

Appreciate your comment. The more people start living the Bitcoin standard from the inside out, the harder it becomes to co-opt.

Absolutely. And is this where Gresham's law comes into play, good money will drive out bad? Eventually people will choose bitcoin and hopefully, in the main, those who need it most, choose it first. Agree education and communication is vital, alongside easy to use tools. Not everyone will and can have offline storage and utxo's. The other hope i have is that as more and more people who understand this come to be in different roles, e.g. politicians, they start having the difficult conversations and make the tougher short term decisions for long term gain. I do agree, it feels like we are at an inflection point and we must all do what we can

Appreciate you engaging so thoughtfully, Jamesy. This isn’t the easiest topic to face up to, and I’ve found that the more I’ve dug into it, the more complex and uncomfortable the questions become.

I’ve been working quietly on a broader project that explores this in depth, looking at how power structures may be shifting around Bitcoin rather than away from it. Some of the early conclusions I’ve come to suggest time is the most underestimated variable. Or more precisely, the lack of it.

That leads to some uncomfortable end points, especially for those who aren’t paying attention, or who think Bitcoin’s adoption will automatically preserve its ethos.

We need more conversations like this, open, grounded, and forward-looking.

Because you’re right: we are at an inflection point, and the decisions made now (or not made) could define the architecture of the next monetary era.

Thank you again for engaging, I take great value from your viewpoint 👊🏻