Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar L0la L33tz

Economists at the Bank of International Settlements just proposed that *any coin* that has *ever* passed through a no-KYC wallet should be banned from regulated services.

The economists argue that their approach would enable a culture of self-policing, or “duty of care,” in which even users of non-custodial wallets would not accept no-KYC coins, report illicit activity, and engage in voluntary KYC.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq46rsulmv4uqvm83zs9f6v0rdra44wztlz45jpljlfgdp6k4t37qqythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qqs9v49knx92tegp7x78lgveuntu98jr5qfvccrhz5uyff2s3egqg3c6q6aut

Avatar
Lonelypumpkins 4mo ago

Since the majority of bitcoin exists in self-custody wallets, the BIS is proposing that the majority of bitcoin should be considered "bad" bitcoin.

Why stop at bitcoin? They should be able to say which cars, houses, pieces of art, or gold coins are "bad" too!

To them, value isn't subjective and determined my market participants...it's whatever the hell they say it is.

nostr:nevent1qqsxuqz8z9eyacqxvttynz892pxmn9c7pzjw95ltvdm6mk3swcvh7egpr9mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctv9upzpk9xancv89h24rme53yhl6dh0hyhwce528eu5hrrfcsgvkg3vermqvzqqqqqqy7r6eyj

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.