Laser be fuckin
nostr:nevent1qqsfh5jwwkfmvhz562rpnma5zdamcgyxpa3a55qsrul7kdu4gls0mscwwf260
Discussion
And virtue signaling.
It's not common sense.
No - but you’re actually oversimplifying.
Women want more than to just be “fucked” - although that’s definitely a piece.
Women want deep intimacy.
Sometimes that’s very primal and animalistic.
Sometimes that’s very emotional.
Sometimes it’s an uncertain and adventurous experience.
Sometimes is fun and playful.
Sometimes it’s sensual and soft.
Sometimes it’s boderline scary.
Many men - especially smaller and shorter men - get emasculated by their mothers and cultures and wives.
So I understand your framing.
But the reality is women want to be genuinely surprised. Feel surrendered.
Feel deeply desired and taken.
Feel a profound trust with their man.
This is when/how the animal and the spiritual converge in sex.
*They* want to experience intimacy with a strong, confident, and cool tempered man.
They can't experience that with an emotionally needy grownup boy that needs to experience it too.
The man tends to the coolness, the woman tends to the warmth.
If the man tends to the warmth, he leaves nothing for the woman.
Don't enter her space; you'll only monopolize it, robbing her of her role.
"women want to be genuinely surprised"
This is certainly true but I'd caveat it by saying that women want to be surprised in their man's leadership, not his accomodations.
Women will accept accomodations, but it will come at the cost of respect and followership because accomodations= servitude = man not leading.
This is stating the obvious.
Genuinely surprising a woman can’t be done by “accommodating” them.