TLDR?

https://video.nostr.build/95ccace291ed11b0cfa946bd3b4d6cd1ec8d33c9b38417f442ccad19110f5c46.mp4

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So the science is fake and gay. What else is knew? 😂

Here’s the Grok TLDR:

“The 2010 PhD thesis by Don Maisch critiques how Western exposure standards for radiofrequency/microwave (RF/MW) electromagnetic radiation from telecom tech (e.g., cell phones, radar) have been set since the 1950s. It argues that bodies like IEEE and ICNIRP (backed by WHO’s EMF Project) use a “Procrustean approach”—forcing scientific data to fit a thermal-only hazard model (where only heating effects matter), while ignoring or marginalizing evidence of non-thermal biological risks due to political, military, and industry biases/conflicts of interest. This prioritizes economic interests over public health. Case studies cover US IEEE standards development, their global spread, and Australia’s failed attempt at ICNIRP harmonization. Maisch calls for reforming the process (e.g., better peer review, risk assessment) and reassessing biological limits, given widespread exposure.”