Do you agree that art is an expression of creativity via a medium to elicit an emotional response?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No.

“That’s trashy” is an emotional response but the trigger certainly isn’t “art,” by any means.

Hmm, I don't think so. I do believe that art is expression, but there isn't necessarily any creativity involved. For example, you can express something that you observed directly, or that someone else communicated to you. I don't think creativity is required for the actual expression itself. A ton of art is incredibly formulaic, especially the better someone understands the medium the more diverse and interesting they can make their art without having to exercise any personal creativity.

I also don't think eliciting an emotional response is the goal of art. Like, yeah, if you do a good job of communicating "wow, this thing here really sucks" then you can make your audience feel sad, or if you do a really good job of communicating an interesting idea then your audience might be surprised or impressed. But fundamentally I believe that it's about communication.

Do you have any other questions for me? What do you think?