Nostr Web Client

I like it except i think more of a range per rating for amount of sats sent, rather than individual benchmarks, due to individual monetary restraint, would make more sense to me. Some the best notes get the small zaps... except the 10. That is currently the more spammy level . So maybe like 11-100 carry equal weight, 101-1000 carry equal weight.... and so on. Does that make sense? Am I understanding correctly? And thank you for asking for my opinion! 😁

Jay 11mo ago

Yeah, I see what you're saying: to have bucket-ranges that carry the same weight. I like that idea.

The idea of these engagement scores is to compare engagement between peers and how each user allocates their attention across their network. So things like zaps would be relative to you and me and our balance, for example. My gut hypothesis is that regardless of the weights of any of these note kinds, the engagement between two friends will always be roughly equal. And "followers" are people who expend a lot of engagement with relatively less in return. You can have big influencers with lots of followers and few friends, because maybe they keep their social circles private rather than in the open. I just want a program that lists my friends' npubs tbh 😂

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Dawn 11mo ago

I like it. I'd use it. It would be nice to see a visual representation of extending that olive branch and who's been reciprocal, who's acted aloof, etc... and how I have acted too. Follows shouldn't need to be a marriage. Interests change, value varies, trust is rare.