> You can send up 70 UTXOs

Don't you see how consolidating these would be very bad?

Maybe you meant you can get ~70 UTXOs out from a Tx0?

> Whrilpool have no censorship

Only government can censor.

Everything else is just a private entity deciding who they do business with.

> does noy work with chainanalysis

Neither does zkSNACKs. Or do you say you are "working" with a shopkeeper when you buy something from the store?

> Its a zerolink cj and it breaks deterministic links

The protocol #[6] designed is being used but unfortunately, Scamourais understanding of it is similar to Roger Ver's understanding of the Bitcoin whitepaper.

Both are naively nitpicking on the wording.

Hiding the toxic change and different input values in one transaction before a coinjoin does nothing against observers, but it does cost more in mining fees.

> no address reuses or merges.

How about the consolidation of multiple toxic change outputs to join a pool?

Regarding address reuse, afaik neither implementation has them at the moment but it's a problem in both projects history. It might become a thing again in the future, like when Wasabi needs to allow payments in coinjoins.