I feel you 😂💜🫂 I’m definitely watching Harry Potter tonight.
What about instead of private accounts it’s just something that only enables people that follow you and who you follow to comment? (if you turn that on. Otherwise the default is open)
So you can see each other but you control who gets to comment on your posts? They can still talk rubbish about you most likely on their own feed, still free to be a plonker, but you don’t have to be notified about it?
Yes so I’ve thought about that too but that kind of comments-for-mutuals-only seems a little difficult to accomplish via nostr… maybe I’m wrong about that? I’ll have to think on it. But that was a big discussion on Twitter when Mute was introduced but people still preferred Block because then bad actors couldn’t even reply. That’s a little tougher on an open protocol.
Damn, this is hard 🙈 yeah, I wanted to keep it decentralised 🥹
I do have a second option, but you guys won’t like it.
We write some options down on prices of paper. Then we get someone’s cute puppy to pick one. Whichever one the puppy picks we go with, cos who in their right mind would get mad at a puppy? 🥹
How nips are actually are created.
🐶🐶🐶
There’s a github repo: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips
Here is the process:
Criteria for acceptance of NIPs
1. They should be implemented in at least two clients and one relay -- when applicable.
2. They should make sense.
3. They should be optional and backwards-compatible: care must be taken such that clients and relays that choose to not implement them do not stop working when interacting with the ones that choose to.
4. There should be no more than one way of doing the same thing.
5. Other rules will be made up when necessary.
You can see and participate in the discussions for proposed nip’s here: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pulls
The conversations tend to be pretty technical but there’s always a need for diverse kinds of inputs in the design process.
