Perhaps at some point as relays grow they may need a way to

- accept reports of alleged violations

- review for verification

- remove the referenced note.

The problems are obvious human cost to review, and adding the features to report, review, remove or reject, and prevent reposts of same note or content. It becomes a rising cost issue and is tantamount to censorship and subject to different laws by jurisdiction.

All systems go through this as they get more usage because there is always bad Apples

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It would be super difficult to remove any violating notes as you’d easily rebroadcast to other relays? You’d need coordination of some sort?

I think it makes more sense to subscribe to some sort of intermediary services that filters for you (for illegal content). Not sure what that looks like technically, just thinking out loud.

Great, so all nostr has to do to comply is to remove its main selling point: censorship resistance!