Im crying about it. LOL. Still running knots. Core are dead to me.
Discussion
You should hope not, considering knots is just a fork of core ... Lol
We never hwve to upgrade. That is also an option. 
Amazing someone so irresponsible has got >20% of Noderunner support so quickly. What does that say about Core Devs?
It doesn't say much about core devs, it says a lot about technically illiterate bitcoiners who don't understand the debate and who think they are personally "doing something" to save Bitcoin, which is not at risk in the first place.
It shows Core Devs have lost the community and are no longer the trustes bitcoin implementation. Talk about not being able to read the room. Fuck me.
they don't need the retards of the community. Feel free to fork to your permissioned zkproof luke chaijn and have fun being retards over there.
The amount of cope coming from Core shows they do actually. Your poor understanding and attitude to Noderunners and Bitcoiners is also telling. Were you dropped as a baby? Or you just super dumb. 
The fact that you use the word "noderunners" shows how much of an idiotic retard you are. You do realize running a node does literally nothing? being a noderunner does fuck all for the network.
Nodes that do not mine and produce blocks for the blockchain are entirely useless to the network, their only use is for you as bitcoin user to verify your transactions for yourself, and to do so without requesting blocks with your transactions from someone else's node, letting them know which addresses are yours which is a privacy concern.
That's it.
There is zero benefit for bitcoin if you are core "noderunner" or knots "noderunner". neither one benefits bitcoin's security or the confirmation of new transactions. The only reason to do run a non-mining node is to verify your own transactions in the blockchain without having to rely on someone else. The only additional benefit, is you're doing so more privately by querying your own node instead of chainalysis' node.
You can directly infer how stupid someone is by if they use the noderunner, and they are even more stupid if they think they are somehow "protecting" or "saving" bitcoin by being one.
So you're saying there is a benefit?
read what I wrote fuckwit. there is no benefit for the bitcoin network. the only benefit is for a user to verify their own transactions.
not for bitcoin. not for censoring transactions. sorry retard.
So you can relay your own transactions. Who knew?
Great "gotcha". Core's argument so bad they have to wheel out the XMR scammers to defend them. GFY
You should understand that while you may not be relaying these transactions, running Knots does litterally nothing to stop them from being mined and they will ultimatly end up on your node anyway:
Yes, i understand this. Miners also need to understand the risks when going against node policies.
your node policies don't matter, which is the point. Miners decide what the chain is.
Filters stop spam in the mempool if they are not mined. What dont you unserstand about that? Miners then also filter using datacarrier. Catch up FFS.
no, they don't stupid. The undesirable transactions filtered by knots "noderunner" retards just show up in other non-knots nodes' mempools and get mined by non-ocean miners, or directly by miners via out of band channels making you all retarded morons that accomplish exactly nothing.
Drink thia you fucking tool 
For anyone that doesn't want to help these retards censor consensus-valid fee paying transactions, ban knots nodes.
You fucking retard. Go fuck yourself with your dumbness.
go use lukechain and fuck off, fucktard.
https://video.nostr.build/18d5d005a95b4a63db5f127dce79fe36f7847b3af091302df8a8adf7e901f39e.mp4 Go play with your crypto loser
cry more about it
they are too stupid to understand this
I donβt understand the argument that because someone is doing something bad elsewhere we need to change the code.