Honestly don't know what to think about it.

I love Odell and the whole team ' (Opensats, HRF etc) dedication to support this space which is admirable, but can't we hear his point of view ?

Can't he be concerned by the "who" is funding Bitcoin development ?

PS: I'm probably missing a lot of inputs on this specific issue but so far, I'm not so sure that he is the bad guy some people say he is. He is just playing his 4D chess game as a big regulated public company. But I still think he is on our side overall.

We don't have to "slay all of our heroes" just because it's possible to do so when we disagree

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

IT IS AN OPEN SYSTEM. HE CAN HAVE ANY OPINION HE WANTS.

THAT SAID, MANY PEOPLE ACCUSED ME OF LYING WHEN I MADE MY CLAIM.

NOW WE CAN PUT THAT BEHIND US AND HAVE AN OPEN DISCUSSION.

YES

Couldn’t make it work, doing something in July

Did you interview jack mallers when he came to Bedford ?

YES. I’ll take humility, integrity, honesty, consistency, dogged determination and willingness to admit mistakes over a person making a good investment decision any time, every time.

I’m wondering if this is simply a good investment for Saylor rather than a real commitment to the Bitcoin sphere.

Would we be hearing so much Saylor if it hadn’t turned out well? You’ve heard and will continue to hear ODELL. I’m with MATT and will ride Bitcoin to zero.

P.S. He growing more arrogant with time. Fuck Saylor.

P.P.S. GOOD MORNING NOSTR! 😎🍒

You posted an out of context 30 second clip that proves nothing. Post his entire response to the question. It's exceptionally considered and puts the long term health of Bitcoin front and center with zero ambiguity.