#emmanuelmacron - like i said 2 prime ministers ago... this woman is your answer. her politics are solid and is not afraid of you. if bayrou is censured - the most effective way to shut up the incompetent left is to elevate a competent leftist.

and let them all see themselves clearly -

https://x.com/mathildepanot/status/1964734059206389944?s=46

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

mathilde panot will light the fascist right like barnier on fire.

she already did it once. 🚬

i think it would be great. ☕️

📇⬇️ policy:

i have no use for senator kennedy's politics in most settings but this is an example of simple reality against rhetoric.

i believe it is as much a profound disservice against the lbgtqai+ community to be associated with pornography as their exclusive pout of identity reference as it is to have graphic sexual scenes in the children's section of libraries. it has nothing to do with gayness to expose children to extreme sexual description than it does with straightness keeping all diversity from being taught.

and to teach gay children they are nothing more than sex objects as an identity is also grooming - ability and sexuality. i don't care which lobby promotes it: pornography marketed to children and youth is a cheap sell for exploitation markets. is there nothing more to all layers of gayness than sex? maybe that is the more important conversation.

as for holding up the mirror: rhetorical sensationalism at all costs never has a solution. only grandstanding. that is the point.

https://youtu.be/yYVNVH2fA5U?si=sAh9WXg1qpXOKL2X

nostr:nevent1qqs9x63c24ukgru9n6wpgq8mdummn46mk5xr6x6238grwv37sn59aycpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq32amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd45kcmm49ekx7mqpramhxue69uhkummnw3ez6un9d3shjtnyd9nkjarpd3kk7c3wwfhsz9thwden5te0dehhxarj9e5kummnw3sjucmryx6p2u

banning books, and encouraging thoughtful literary explorations and choices are different conversations.

any librarian with any sense would not choose those books - not because they are pornographic, but because they present a hollow portraiture of gayness. a student might only pick up one book in this genre - is that the point? traumatizing them into being afraid of what they learned? selective grooming of straight children is almost as much the point as christian nationalists shilling gays to scare them straight.

not - banning books. how about i challenge you to write more sensible explorations of the layers of gayness. that's the solution.

gayness is not more about sex than straightness. that is an uncomfortable truth for those who hate gays.

brenda laurel epstein codes child exploitation into her "games". warping all sense of tether to reality and baseline morality is literally what her metrics promote. the geisha becoming the whore is one of her favorite tropes - validating predation enables sexual violence.

nostr:nevent1qqsy75xrqaqqsm7kwl6f47skzpka9xhctwq76rte305uftmd3wdaxaspzemhxue69uhkummnw3ezuun9d3shjetj9eek2qgjwaehxw309ahkvenrdpskjm3wwp6kyqg4waehxw309ahx7um5wfjkc6t5v4ejummjvuq3gamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wdau8gu3wv3jhvpwjzzd

if journalists and those who discuss difficult topics are banned from your X platforms for those posts (like myself), #elonmusk, because your baby mama gets upset - i think it is worth considering your barometrics for protecting integrity are skewed. the tone for behavior on your platform is set by your account .... a lie.

a staff of pretenders and activists with niche agendas using your name to gin up engagements.

how is anything trustworthy on X when a trust model is not welcome to post on a verified set of accounts?

#elonmusk