Agreed totally. Neither have I any interest in changing their lifes in any way. If they don't explicitely ask for my help - not my business.
Discussion
Since some of my nocoiner frens have bigger IQs than me, I have concluded that bitcoin is not such a test but a more complex one. Hopefully by 2028 halving I'd have made more progress with my theories. So far, the ones who have started to wake up have little powder to ape in and the ones who have the capital to do so are still arrogant.
I think measuring IQ by solving artificial riddles is not the right way of doing it. Whoever lives the happiest life is the winner, and therefore has the highest IQ.
Bitcoin is not so much a matter of solving riddles, but primarily about making the right moral choices, and only secondly math, economics, etc.. And making correct moral choices is one of the first prerequisites before anything else in achieving happiness. Solving riddles and everything else won't matter if moral choices are incorrect.
Those who abandon morality to any degree, fail to notice the important detail, fail to decide the right priorities in their lifes. Where is Intelligence Quotient in that? What is now called IQ should be renamed to RSS (riddle solving skill).
Those who have already understood bitcoin but don't have any savings yet, may have not earned them yet (young) or may have been robbed by the fiat system. Either way, they will accumulate their savings soon.
Those who have savings but don't understand bitcoin yet, don't deserve them, i.e. they are the ones who robbed the former ones. These two types will have to switch places eventually.