You seem me talking about Monero being a competitor of Bitcoin on terms of reserve currency where?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Comment wasn’t targeted at you, I was just throwing the thought out there in anticipation of how I thought a lot of people might respond to it in an effort to learn more.

I thought maybe you’d have some insight since I would expect a lot of bitcoiners to respond negatively about Monero

Sorry, I misunderstood.

Toxic people are everywhere but as i can see people are getting more awareness that Maximalism is a non sense theory

the maximalists preserved btc for you and are the only honest bunch around this hellhole...

and toxic maximalism is Beauty. which is Truth; Love.

protoplasm always calcifies its just a matter of into what...

That isn’t true, i see so called maximalists advizing you to buy on centralized exchanges, and so on and on.

Bitcoin isn’t the best for everything, and bitcoin has more shitcoinery on code than Monero at these days, and Monero is more censorship resistant than Bitcoin my friend.

what are you a 2017'er or later?

im not talking about maximalists (name one) who advise where to buy , but the people who built the shit , followed by those who defended it in the early years against attacks by agents...

if you arent familiar with this chapter you really prolly shouldnt be making statements like that.

human nature is rotten envious and lazy dont forget it. most people are so naive in regard to the enemy btc faces that they are dangerous - maximalists are those that KNOW this and act and speak accordingly.

http://trilema.com/2012/bitcoin-and-the-poor/

this aint no feel good game and HBDGAF...

bitcoin is ultra-conservative. liberal "values" will die under it. rejoice.

Here is a list of the giants whose shoulders they stood on or built the Bitcoin

"Privacy" "Untraceable" "Anonymous" all heavily emphasized in their texts and titles

What does this sound more like to you Bitcoin or something like Monero?

If you aren't familiar maybe *you* really prolly shouldnt be making statements like that

"Digital Cash & Privacy" 1993 -Hal Finney

"The Case for Privacy" 2005 -David D. Friedman

"Credit With Privity" 1996 -Nick Szabo

"Confidential Auditing" 1998 -Nick Szabo

"Blind Signatures for Untraceable Payments" 1982 -David Chaum

"Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms" 1988 -David Chaum

"The Dining Cryptographers Problem: Unconditional Sender and Recipient Untraceability" 1988 -David Chaum

"Proofs that Yield Nothing But Their Validity or All Languages in NP Have Zero-Knowledge Proof Systems" 1991 -Oded Goldreich, Silvio Micali, and Avi Wigderson

"Online Cash Checks" 1989 -David Chaum

"On Digital Cash-Like Payment Systems" 2005 -Daniel A. Nagy

"Secrecy, Authentication, and Public Key Systems" 1979 -Ralph C. Merkle

"Computer Systems Established, Maintained, and Trusted by Mutually Suspicious Groups" 1982 -David Chaum

"b-money" 1998 -Wei Dai

"The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto" 1988 -Timothy C. May

"The Cyphernomicon" 1994 -Timothy C. May

"Contracts in Cyberspace" 2000 -David D. Friedman

"Contracts with Bearer" 1999 -Nick Szabo

"Crypto Glossary" 1992 -Eric Hughes and Timothy C. May

"Cyberspace, Crypto Anarchy, and Pushing Limits" 1994 -Timothy C. May

"The Geodesic Market" 1998 -Robert Hettinga

"The God Protocols" 1999 -Nick Szabo

"Trusted Third Parties are Security Holes" 2001 -Nick Szabo

https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library

sorry what isnt true?

👆see it took a few minutes for someone to be toxic just because you mentioned an opinion that something besides Bitcoin has any value for any reason lol. That’s why I very rarely engage with anyone on the internet and only just started doing it again on nostr. Toxicity is toxicity regardless of the topic at hand. Toxic maximalists just need a few strong doses of 🍄, then maybe they’d reassess the value of it. Fully expecting a nasty toxic response to this, trying to grow some internet calluses to toughen myself up a bit tho, so whatevs 😃