Nostr Web Client

I think he is brilliant because he logically constructed an argument from first principles in the WiM Lowery series.

He went layer by layer through his argument and arrived at conclusions. He did it in detail and consulted a great many people.

Not many can do that.

Anyone may not agree with his conclusions, that is any person's right, however his argument is very reasoned and I have enjoyed his perspectives.. I've learnt a great deal fore about many subjects in the process.

I feel his series on WiM is the equal of the Saylor series, and that is a great compliment .. thats why.

thinkgreen147ce3cb68e 2y ago 💬 1

Ooo I gotta check that out. Appreciate your feedback.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Aurelian 2y ago 💬 4

Lowery's arguments are methodologically flawed. There's a reason why austrian economics is so dominant in the bitcoin space

thinkgreen147ce3cb68e 2y ago

I’m all ears if you care to explain. Always willing to listen to a new perspective.

Conza 2y ago

https://twitter.com/Conza/status/1505346657365360643 scroll up, then back down.

Gaz 2y ago

Similar to Jason's argument, yours is also well defined, so respect for that. I'm in no position to try to counterargue, there's no point and Im just not that smart to do it well.

If Bitcoin is stronger from either argument or a combination, that's fine with me.

Conza 2y ago

It's incredibly worse off from his ludicrous notion of a weapon, and sets up a state attack vector.

Which is the JarHeads employer, which is why his blind spot is monumental.