How can you say I'm not engaging into an honest intellectually conversation?

I saw your note yesterday. I listen to the 1h32 video you linked to. I listen multiple times to sections of the video I reacted to in my note. I did the research, wrote a long and structured note with science-based references and resources.

It took you 6 min to write your response to my note. You didn't engage in an honest intellectual conversation. You didn't read the research paper, the articles or listen to the podcasts I linked to. You said it's not worth your time.

Humans being carnivores is grade 7 biology, there is nothing delusional about that.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Wait did you make a new npub bc I muted you? 😂

Plants foods are filled with lectins (harmful), dozens of carcinogens (harmful), anti-nutrients (deleterious), oxalates (harmful) and natural pesticides (harmful). This isn’t up for debate. These are facts. Plants are bad for humans. This is exactly where we started and none of these facts were address. Goal posts moved instead.

Most of your reply is conclusions like “the hard evidence presented doesn’t mean we’re carnivores” 😂😂 it’s low intelligence conjecture trash. Dumb people really don’t know they’re dumb.

My animosity was directed to BTC p2p not you bud. Thanks for the info.