As Tucker Carlson recently objected to AI vehicles on the roads and was lambasted with pejorative responses, I wanted to approach the subject from a different angle.

Centralization vs decentralization.

I think there is reason to pause a bit here.

AI-driven vehicles on the road is a systemic weakness. If they all have a bad update they may all stop or worse. Those of us who have worked in environments with automated systems have seen this over and over again.. If the systems get hacked, then what? A solar flare? Electric grid dependencies. Etc.

Human truckers form a more resilient structure; decentralized & flexible.

Let me make this very clear:

The central planning scenario IS to have government-controlled AI vehicles on the road.

The decentralized scenario is having autonomous, flexible human drivers on the road.

Let's explore this further:

Scenario A: The government becomes totalitarian and controls all AI trucker vehicles on the road.

Scenario B: The government becomes totalitarian and human sovereign truckers drive vehicles on the road.

Which is the central planning scenario here?

Which scenario have central chokepoint dependencies?

Which scenario is resilient?

The purpose of a free market is..

Liberty.

Liberty brings prosperity.

Prosperity does not necessarily bring liberty.

A centrally planned society is not a free market. A decentralized society can be a free market; it has the potential.

The question: how do we achieve a robust, decentralized society.

Under a central planning system, the markets are rigged and there is no real free market to speak of.

The dectralization point of having human workers in critical infrastructure is because they are sovereign, thinking, flexible individuals that can react rationally and individually to new problems and situations. AI can't do that.

Humans, with our diversity of outlooks, can't just be mass-programmed to perform orders via fiat decree, at least not by certain assumption. Orders have to pass a human proof-of-work, or as we may call it, a proof-of-bullshit-resilience filter; the human mind.

One of the greatest problems that humans may live to fight and solve, IS an automated, dictatorial central planning system. If we can't fight such a system, free markets have no future.

Government-controlled AI systems cannot solve that problem for us. Only sovereign humans can. Decentralized minds making local decisions based on local experience, insight and rapidly changing circumstances and new data.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

☝️ ⚑️

Continuing on the decentralization theme:

The Canadian Freedom Convoy protest one year ago can inform us on the subject of decentralization.

That protest against government overreach was possible *because* there was a free(ish) market of sovereign human individuals making decisions based on preservation of liberties.

If all the trucking vehicles on the road had been centrally controlled AI-driven vehicles,, there would have been no ability for the Canadian people suffering under authoritarianism to display such an effective infrastructure protest against government mandated injections and restrictions.

And of course, if the fundraiser had been done entirely with bitcoin, it couldn't have been blocked or interfered with, and a million Canadian citizens wouldn't have had accounts frozen.

Don't forget that part.

πŸ’―

Bitcoin is the best liberty and decentralization technlogy we have and we in the bitcoin community could provide the truckers with instant fundibg while the centrally controlled legacy systems were shut down and donors were accused of criminal behavior for supporting the liberty convoy.

Getting the bitcoin to the people was the easy part. Having a local bitcoin adoption with businesses accepting it, etc would have made a world of difference. How do we get there?

Trying to pressure existing businesses into accepting bitcoin is a losing strategy. Bitcoiners building businesses that heavily incentivise paying with bitcoin, only trade for it, is the winning one.

The "old guard" (100x returns) bitcoiners taking on the role of venture capitalists could do wonders for that. I also wonder whether there's an investment strategy that could use zap-style fundraising? Yesterday proved pretty convincingly you can precisely track who paid you how much, after all.

That’s a very well thought note. Brilliant. Cars that are always connected to the internet are a liability to maximum freedom.