Nostr Web Client

"If you are looking for Americas next enemy, look at who were funding right now", I think there's going to be a lot of pissed off extremists in Ukraine with all kinds of advanced weaponry that are mad we sacrificed them/didn't give them enough help.

WoodenQ 2y ago

President Davey Smith nails it !

As far as weapons, most are used to fund CIA operations, running them to Africa. PoorCIA took a financial hit after their poppy fields became less popular. Far deadlier, fast acting, and costs less street drug is available now. If your into “population control “ ya gotta be happy with that one !

As far as “help”

Feeding hatred of all things “Russian” in the birthplace of Russia was executed well by American state department operatives. It would be a good bet that most would think “ we didn’t help enough “

However , there could be more intelligent people from Ukraine who saw this operation early on or are now realizing the “game”

Once again a President who ran on “ peace” ( couldn’t speak Ukrainian when elected) gave them needless murder following American “peace” Presidents example.

Ok here we go ! Ready ?

The only “ Leader” that has shown restraint is PUTIN!!

Ok, ready ? Hit me with your best shot!

I’m a vet , I can take it

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Geist 2y ago

No, I think you are right, and that's an opinion that will get you flamed by basically everyone for saying. If Putin wanted Ukraine he'd have turned Kiev to rubble and shot a hypersonic missile up zelinskies ass. I think he wants Ukraine to remain relatively stable and not get completely subsumed by insane radicals, and if that means the war has to go on for a couple/few years at least it doesn't end looking like Libya, and that might mean leaving zelinsky in charge and waiting for the Ukrainians to strike themselves out. Its fucking stupid that we have responded by telling them to throw more bodies at a meat grinder to turn back an agreement everyone there wanted, we have some sick people in charge.

Prox 2y ago

I think Nato's goal is to weaken russia as much as they can while not sacrificing their own troops. So far it seems to be working. It will take probably over a decade for russia to recover from this, possibly longer.

Geist 2y ago

Maybe, but at what cost? The US dollar as the world reserve currency is seeing cracks in the foundation, the Saudis are looking for an exit, military recruitment is the lowest its been in decades (new recruits for nonspecialized roles are getting bigger sign on bonuses than I got as a nuclear reactor operator/electronics technician less than 10 years ago), African countries are inviting Wagner in to remove France and are looking to replace the west with Russia and China, and of course the mountain of bodies on which the threat of nuclear war rests. This is to add to the fed causing banks to go under and still failing to curb assets and equities, a deepening social divide, etc, etc, etc.

We aren't in a position to take on the war in Ukraine, and I stand unconvinced that Russia is in the dire straights everyone seems to believe.

Geist 2y ago

And if you really gotta ask why retention/recruitment rates are so low in the US, try telling an 18 year old to not slow down for the minefield, that they need to be more aggressive when they are taking small arms into artillery barrages.