Having just posted this, I decided to look at Libre Relay on Geyser and they state this:
------
For example, Bitcoin Core maintains the pointless OP_Return size limit, even though it's just one of many ways to publish data in Bitcoin transactions; Libre Relay doesn't.
------
https://geyser.fund/project/librerelay?hero=mike1
The controversy continues 🤔
So the argument is evolving, Core is moving away from consensus with Knots and towards consensus with Libre Relay.
I get OP_RETURN limit is considered pointless, but it wouldn't be if all other attack vectors were shut down.
Does this really come down to native JPEGs on Bitcoin or no JPEGs on Bitcoin?
Ooh look, a TX with a long OP_RETURN, I believe Libre Relay allows this, which slightly moots this X posts claim, but even so, it is interesting:
https://mempool.space/tx/3183bd6ceebc2d39c0a3cfa0d06eb84d1161eaac1c26605e2eab62bfe48c1420
https://x.com/raw_avocado/status/1919654684110774492
nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp6pmv65w6tfhcp73404xuxcqpg24f8rf2z86f3v824td22c9ymptqyv8wumn8ghj7enfd36x2u3wdehhxarj9emkjmn99uq35amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwvajhgctvvfujucm0d5hhvvgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsqgz5jux7pvhx4khvk9e47yjsht3pyqp4ct5wyruhfp39fzvu8f90hvmnwnag
:
But you can't run Dojo
👀
You didn't know?
I didn't care, sorry 🫂
I'm sending myself to my room with nothing to eat until I've had a chance to think about what I've said and consider my actions in the future 😞
I'd also consider who is behind knots. A single person in control of a system. A man that, apparently, got hacked of his stack but didn't know how? All seems dodgy to me but who am I? Just an ageing Cockney fireman
