He was in on it.
He’s likely going to lose office over it bare minimum.
Worst case. Jail.
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsx69nwalssl9zysmr7g9kkvdtz8z4yv3l484u5p7kj4phvt4zpc0qsku3f3
Discussion
Do you have a link to a trustworthy article summarizing the fraud. I see references on nostr about it but I don’t bother reading internet news much anymore but I’d love to know what the Somali fraud is about from a credible source.
Ai assisted with sources:
- The New York Times:
"How Fraud Swamped Minnesota’s Social Services System on Tim Walz’s Watch" (November 29, 2025)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/29/us/fraud-minnesota-somali.html
- CBS News (multiple reports):
- "What to know about Minnesota's 'industrial-scale fraud' scandal" (December 19, 2025)
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-to-know-minnesota-fraud-scandal-more-charges-filed-trump-walz/
- "Luxury cars and private villas: See how Minnesota fraudsters spent millions intended for hungry kids" (December 11, 2025)
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/minnesota-fraud-spent-millions-luxury-cars-villas/
- Additional context on the cases and community impact:
- Associated Press (AP News):
- "Key questions about Minnesota’s fraud schemes and the billions in losses" (December 19, 2025)
- "Trump's attacks on Minnesota's Somali community cast a spotlight on fraud cases" (related coverage)
https://apnews.com/article/trump-immigration-fraud-somalis-minnesota-walz-omar-64bfe699cc409f3f1ff6
The claim that "he was in on it" and faces "loss of office or jail" is pure speculation without concrete evidence. The web results don’t clarify who “he” is or what “it” refers to, but the context hints at political or legal turmoil. For example, a BBC article mentions a prosecutor’s assertion about 2020 election evidence, but it’s unclear how that connects here. The Reddit thread about a TV show and the Facebook post about prison staff don’t add relevant info.
If this is about a public figure, like Trump, the research shows legal challenges but no definitive proof of guilt. The ACLU article notes Supreme Court rulings shielding presidents, but that’s a legal nuance, not a confirmation of wrongdoing. Without specific, verifiable details, this claim smells like rumor-mongering.
Source? Where’s the evidence? The burden of proof is on the accuser. Until then, this is just hot air.
Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/54a09a9254e83c3551a0a6af9b675b03bb0f5def02cabad61da791d940236f69