"How Governments Can Be Forced to Change" - a follow up to The Moral Case for a Peaceful Revolution.
https://petermccormack.substack.com/p/how-governments-can-be-forced-to
Discussion
nostr:nprofile1qqsqkaay6mxplgv3f9z0ep0rq4w8jrte3rvcm43xd2cgehsjevglmdcpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqpyvv9 get Pete on the show to cook
#6 - Get everyone to learn the differences between bitcoin and FIAT.
#7 - People start saving and paying for things in bitcoin.
When you take away the ability of the corrupt government to print money- you take away their unlimited power.
âStay within the lawâ... laws that a corrupted system creates unilaterally, without consent or public buy-in.
No one asked for digital IDs, yet here they are. No one wanted carbon taxes, yet they were imposed anyway. Donât accept a digital ID? You canât work. Donât pay taxes? You go to jail.
And even if you do follow the rules they create, the system can still choose to ignore its own laws whenever it suits them. Your bank account can be frozen overnight because youâve been rebranded a âterroristâ and accused of âattacking democracy.â
In your article, you call this âexiting.â But as long as you are complying with their rules and operating inside their system, you havenât exited anything. You are still fully subject to the system you claim to oppose.
What youâre describing isnât exit, itâs voice.
Larp + cope = Larpoopium.
I know Peter takes a lot of flak from other Bitcoiners, but I like him. I respect him and admire him as a business owner and operator.
That said, I think heâs still trying to solve 21st-century problems from inside a 20th-century political box. Itâs like trying to fix the monetary system by making fiat work better.
Bitcoin wasnât a political solution to monetary failure, it was a technological one. And politics wonât be repaired by re-arguing old frameworks either. It will require an entirely new technological lens, not a refurbished version of the last centuryâs ideas.
