#[0] can you explain the algorithm in this: "Iris rejects all content from authors that your social network has not interacted with"? Also what do you think if this is done at a relay level?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I mean not completely dropping a disconnected user's posts but making it harder to spam with adaptive PoW in the beginning. spammers don't have much followers, and will be required to submit more work and this will at least slow them a lot.

Have you seen this:

#[4]

Yes but I don't understand how common words = spam. Btw the link doesn't work now.

#[5] Have you plugged this in? Does it work?

I haven't. Will report when it's live. Plugging it in would save nostr 30k messages per hour.

How I have plugged it in today, already got 200k unique filtered events. #[6]

Everything seems to work on Iris.

Iris does not define spam but just block all content from the users that are not interactived with by the people you follow.

Yes Iris global is working really well most of the time. I see little spam every now and then. Like 10% of the time? But it is not much, a few notes.

Just wanted to know more about its algorithm because I am contemplating on the idea that a spammer, with having no 'real' followers should provide more proof of work to be relayed.

I didn't see spam on IRIS. Nothing. I mean, if you use some others clients you can see REAL SPAM, people spamming QQ groups, spaming his servers as spamers,etc,etc,etc never seen that on iris.

The link was down, works now. 20 words all together mentioned 1000 times per hour - if that's not spam, i don't know what is. Definitely not high quality content