Very good footage from #minneapolis #ICE murder, that there was no intention by the driver to harm any agent. The wheels have never been driving towards an agent.
So it was probably the agents ego that caused him to kill. Not a threat towards him.
That video is misleading, whether intentionally or not. It is a cellphone video, for one, and he is holding it about a foot in front of him (standard cellphone video position). When the car comes at him, it looks like it hits him because it goes *under* where he is holding the phone.
You can see him standing 12 inches away and leaning forwards during the first and second shots in the picture attached. Also, if he was really hit, he probably would have dropped his phone and / or at least limped away, but neither happened.
It was an optical illusion. When you take a slightly closer look and see how the trick was done, you can call it out.
https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/cb79422e4577cde3618226b6ae338e36e98cd70671024b8692e9e872a58bcb1c.webp
Very good footage from #minneapolis #ICE murder, that there was no intention by the driver to harm any agent. The wheels have never been driving towards an agent.
So it was probably the agents ego that caused him to kill. Not a threat towards him.
And incredibly, incredibly incompetent and untrained. It pisses me off how many things I’ve been seeing about “well the laws says her vehicle is a weapon.” (Which she also wasn’t using it as she was clearly leaving…)
Folks focuses on “the law” rather than humanity, morals, a lost soul, and common sense.
Very true. I sometimes am not sure, if it is on nostr inside the so said selfclaimed freedomthinkers of the US. But sometimes it feels as if many plebs do not really value life, based on their notes.
I life in a world, where it is normal to evit killing at all cost. Some write as it would be totally normal for a police officer to make use of their gun.
To me violence is always the strongest way to showcase, that someone is not in control of the situation. When a Person gets payed to represent the law, I would assume they have to act as good examples on how others should act. And not the other way around, that those representing law should get a lower threshold than anyone else. Rather a much higher needs to be in order to balance power.
And everyone profits, when a person that goes against the law gets the full consequences.
And the understanding, that when a "might could have killed" or "felt threatened" are enough to execute selfdefense, then about every murder in this country can say this. And there is no way to proof the opposite.