The lack of principles in the U.S. Libertarian Party, contrary to their idiotic intuition, makes them weaker, not stronger.
Discussion
Which principles should they advance that they're not?
If I'm understanding these guys, property rights solutions instead of taking sides on controversial crap like the border. I haven't been super keeping up with LP news, but it seems they have gone further and further into the panderverse of partisan politics.
Panderverse love that.
Re border: I always thought libertarians were some of the most consistent people who took their principles all the way to their logical conclusion. For example, the ones Ive read advocate for a completely wide open border.
Yeah I'm all for an open border. To be perfectly consistent, that is the way.
Open borders facilitate a culture of self-reliance and tend to lower government welfare too, since voters decide to keep the money for themselves. But some libertarians cannot think that complex, for some reason. For them, at least they should differentiate between people coming in to receive government handouts and people coming in to work. But sadly most people, even a lot of libertarians, are stupid and don't make a distinction in their heads. It's collectivism. They fail to understand private property, consent, or the market.